Complete Maintenance Systems Audit Guide

Performing a quality maintenance systems audit

A Comprehensive Maintenance Systems Audit Guide.

This Comprehensive ‘Maintenance Systems Audit Guide’ is an amalgamation and tidy up of 5 previous audit articles I published in recent years:

1.    Maintenance Systems Audit part 1 – CMMS Success.

2.    Maintenance Systems Audit Part 2 – CMMS Success.

3.    Maintenance Systems Audit Part 3a – CMMS Success.

4.    Maintenance Systems Audit Part 3b – CMMS Success.

5.    Maintenance Systems Audit Part 4 – CMMS Success.

It probably serves as a great companion for these 2 other related articles I’ve published more recently as well:

1.    Asset Operational Performance Audits – CMMS Success.

2.    5 Step Maintenance Systems Auditing – CMMS Success.

Ultimately, I’m just hoping people can take the bits that like from all of this and develop their own Auditing Form that best serves their needs.

A quality maintenance systems audit is a vital resource for organizations aiming to enhance their maintenance management practices.

My information hopefully outlines the importance of conducting periodic audits across various modules to ensure effective maintenance operations.

By establishing a baseline for performance measurement, your organisation can identify areas for improvement and implement strategies that foster continuous enhancement.

I also touch on how regular quality maintenance systems audits can actually do a lot more than just tidy up our maintenance practices. 

I’ve made mention of various risk analysis models, including the Swiss Cheese Model, Bow-Tie Method, HFACS, STAMP, and ICAM, which can help organizations understand potential risks and prevent disasters.

A comprehensive approach to maintenance auditing aims to improve operational efficiency, reduce costs, enhance safety and drive a culture of continuous improvement within organizations and I hope this works out this way for you and your company.

Table Of Contents.

1.0 Introduction to CMMS Success.

2.0 Master Data and Maintenance Strategy Development.

3.0 Work Identification.

4.0 Work Planning.

5.0 Execute Work Readiness.

6.0 Execute Work.

7.0 Complete Work.

8.0 Maintenance Systems Management & Compliance.

9.0 Improvements.

10. Managing Costs & Reporting Functions.

11.0 Asking The Right Types Of Questions During Audits.

12.0 The Critical Role of Quality Audits in Preventing Disasters.

13.0 Conclusion: The Path to Maintenance Excellence.

1.0 Introduction To Auditing Your Maintenance Systems.

Periodic maintenance management systems audits are crucial for ensuring that all work processes are executed efficiently, effectively and at the right times.

By regularly auditing your systems, you not only keep them running smoothly but also identify areas for improvement to ensure your entire maintenance department operates at peak performance.

These audits, often comprehensive in scope, cover your whole organization, revealing potential enhancements beyond just the maintenance systems.

Auditing your maintenance systems is more than a compliance check; it’s a proactive approach to organizational excellence. By systematically evaluating your processes, you can:

·        Ensure adherence to established maintenance procedures.

·        Detect inefficiencies or gaps in the system.

·        Align maintenance activities with broader organizational goals.

Through regular audits, you’ll uncover hidden opportunities for improvement, driving continuous enhancement across all levels of your maintenance operations.

1.1 The Benefits Of Regular Maintenance Systems Audits.

1.    Establish a Baseline: Set a benchmark for measuring future improvements in maintenance performance.

2.    Evaluate Effectiveness: Assess the impact of implemented changes over time.

3.    Gain Insights: Obtain deeper understanding of maintenance management system behaviours and performance trends.

4.    Enhance Communication: Foster better communication and alignment within your maintenance team.

5.    Optimise Resource Allocation: Ensure resources are used efficiently and effectively.

1.2 Common Indicators for Needing a Maintenance Systems Audit.

1.    Inconsistent Performance: Notable fluctuations in performance in specific areas.

2.    Sporadic Success: Irregular success with standard tasks and maintenance activities.

3.    Procedure Compliance Issues: Proper procedures are followed only when time permits, leading to inconsistent practices.

4.    Stressed Leadership: Leadership teams appear stressed and frequently involved in unproductive meetings.

5.    Reactive Work: Staff mainly engage in reactive maintenance work, leaving little time for proactive improvement initiatives.

1.3 Signs Of A Maintenance Department That Is Performing Well.

1.    Proactive Problem Solving: Early identification and resolution of potential issues within the workplace and management systems.

2.    Culture of Continuous Improvement: Viewing problems as opportunities for learning and growth.

3.    Leadership Excellence: Leaders embodying company core values and driving improvement at all levels.

4.    Dedicated Improvement Time: Allocating specific time for employees to work on improvement projects.

1.4 Top 10 Recommended Maintenance Systems Audit Modules.

1.    Master Data & Maintenance Strategy Development.

2.    Work Identification.

3.    Work Planning.

4.    Work Scheduling.

5.    Work Readiness Execution.

6.    Work Execution.

7.    Work Completion.

8.    Maintenance Systems Management & Compliance.

9.    Improvements.

10. Cost Management & Reporting Functions.

1.5 General Audit Process Information.

Data Collection Methods: Include interviews, observations, and data analysis to gather comprehensive insights.

Performance Assessment Scale: Use a percentage scale to evaluate performance:

0 = <50%

1 = 50% to 75%

2 = >75%

Yes/No/Partial Questions: Employ the following scale for clarity:

0 = No

1 = Partial

2 = Yes

2.0 Master Data and Maintenance Strategy Development.

This section focuses on assessing how your organization manages equipment data and develops maintenance strategies within the CMMS.

2.1 Equipment Data Management.

1.    Capture all data for purchased and commissioned equipment in the CMMS.

2.    A criticality analysis is performed on all new assets and either a criticality ranking or business impact code is assigned against each asset.

3.    Spare Parts Requirements are identified for each new asset and submissions are made to the supply department to keep critical parts in stock.

4.    The most critical parts for critical assets are assigned as ‘Insurance Spares’ and are not subject to being removed from stock via stock optimisation calculations (potentially obsolete/slow moving stock).

5.    You develop maintenance strategies for all maintainable assets.

2.2 Evidence of Effective Data Management.

·        Master Data creation is included in project plans for new equipment commissioning.

·        Capital cost centres are used for Master Data creation of new equipment.

·        Safety and Operational Readiness audits are performed on all new equipment before use.

2.3 Biennial Physical Plant Audits.

Conduct physical plant audits every two years maximum to ensure the CMMS equipment register matches physical assets.

Common Issues:

·        Project teams failing to include master data for newly commissioned assets.

·        Decommissioned equipment not deactivated in the CMMS.

2.4 Maintenance Strategy Development.

Strategies should be developed using risk-based analysis, FMECA (Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis) is a good choice, so is RCM (Reliability Centred Maintenance). 

2.4 Asset Hierarchy Data Quality.

·        Consistent asset hierarchy in CMMS, using templates.

·        Clear naming conventions for asset identification.

·        Critical equipment identified and marked in CMMS.

2.5 Materials Management.

1.    Bills of Materials (BOMs):

a.    Created for all critical equipment and entered into CMMS

b.    Reviewed at least every 6 months

c.    Updates include supplier part changes and removal of obsolete parts

2.    Inventory Management:

a.    Max/Min stock levels established for critical parts

b.    Acceptable lead times for ‘order on demand’ parts

3.    Preventive Maintenance Parts:

a.    Parts listings included in parts-intensive preventive maintenance plans

b.    CMMS automatically processes parts requirements before maintenance execution

4.    Parts Availability:

a.    Monitor frequency of maintenance workers needing additional parts for preventive maintenance

b.    Track percentage of added parts

2.6 Key Questions That Should Have Been Asked At This Point.

1.    Is Master Data creation part of new equipment commissioning projects?

2.    Are physical plant audits conducted at least every two years?

3.    How are decommissioned assets handled in the CMMS?

4.    Is risk-based analysis used for maintenance strategy development?

5.    How consistent is the asset hierarchy in the CMMS?

6.    Are BOMs created and regularly updated for critical equipment?

7.    How effective is the inventory management for critical parts?

8.    Are parts requirements for preventive maintenance automatically processed by the CMMS?

3.0 Work Identification.

This section focuses on assessing how new work is identified and processed within your maintenance system.

3.1 Work Request Process.

1.    Documentation and Understanding:

a.    Existence of a documented process for initiating new work.

b.    Staff awareness and comprehension of the process.

c.    Adherence to the established procedure.

2.    Non-CMMS User Work Requests:

a.    Availability of work request forms for those without CMMS access.

b.    Process for entering paper-based requests into the CMMS.

3.2 Work Request Review.

1.    Daily Review Process:

a.    Implementation of a 24-hour review cycle for new work requests.

b.    Involvement of multiple team members in the review process.

2.    Priority and Risk Assessment:

a.    Review and update of originator’s priority designation.

b.    Use of risk assessment processes for priority adjustment.

3.    Approval Workflow:

a.    Approval of work requests prior to work order creation (except for emergencies).

b.    CMMS capability to prevent unapproved requests from becoming work orders.

3.3 Quality Control.

1.    Work Request Quality:

a.    Periodic reviews to assess the quality of information provided by originators.

2.    Duplication Management:

a.    Frequency of duplicate work requests in the CMMS.

b.    Process for originators to check for existing work orders.

c.    Periodic checks for duplicate work in the CMMS.

3.    Work Request Specificity:

a.    Ensuring separate work requests for each distinct problem or defect.

3.4 Work Order Lifecycle.

1.    Time-to-Completion Tracking:

a.    Average time from work request creation to work order completion

b.    Documentation of reasons for delays on incomplete work orders

2.    Escalation Procedures:

a.    Ability to escalate priority of existing work orders when necessary.

3.5 Key Questions That Should Have Been Asked At This Point.

1.    Is there a clear, documented process for initiating new work that is understood and followed by all staff?

2.    Is there a way for work requests from non-CMMS users to be initiated, and entered into the system?

3.    Is there a daily review process for all new work requests involving multiple team members?

4.    Are work request priorities assessed and adjusted if required?

5.    Is there an approval process in place for work requests before they become work orders?

6.    Is the quality of work requests monitored and improved over time?

7.    Are there measures in place to prevent and manage duplicate work requests (is someone deleting duplicates?).

8.    How is the lifecycle of work orders tracked, from request to completion?

9.    Are there clear procedures for escalating the priority of existing work orders when necessary?

4.0 Work Planning.

This section focuses on assessing the planning efforts applied to work orders and the support provided to maintenance planners.

4.1 Planning Process Structure.

1.    Planner Role Understanding:

a.    Clarity of expectations for planners’ core responsibilities.

b.    Process for reviewing and processing maintainer feedback on planned work orders.

2.    Planning Standards:

a.    Existence of specifications for fully planned work orders.

b.    Availability of step-by-step procedures for planning work orders.

4.2 Standard Task Creation.

1.    Frequency and Process:

a.    Creation of standard jobs or task lists for recurring corrective maintenance.

b.    Average monthly creation rate of standard tasks.

c.    Planner knowledge and capability in creating standard tasks.

2.    Documentation:

a.    Availability of procedures for creating standard jobs/task lists.

b.    Responsibility assignment for procedure creation.

4.3 Work Order Resource Allocation.

1.    Trade Resource Identification:

a.    Separate identification of various resource/trade types on work order tasks.

b.    Specification of resource quantities (e.g., 2 x Tyre Fitters).

2.    Time Estimation:

a.    Inclusion of durations and total planned work hours for each task.

b.    Accuracy of time estimates (comparison of planned vs. actual hours).

c.    Methods for planning execution labour requirements and measuring team performance.

4.4 Backlog Management.

1.    Process Guidelines:

a.    Existence of processes for managing backlogged work.

b.    Average duration of non-completed work orders with past start dates.

2.    Company Standards:

a.    Expectations or specifications for maximum backlog size and age.

b.    Leadership involvement in reviewing and updating non-completed work orders.

4.5 Work Pack Creation.

1.    Content:

a.    Creation of comprehensive work packs for fully planned work orders

b.    Inclusion of relevant documentation (e.g., P&IDs, drawings, technical updates, safety instructions)

4.6 Work Order Feedback Process.

1.    Documentation Procedure:

a.    Existence of a documented process for maintainers to mark up corrections on work orders.

b.    Implementation of “Red Pen Mark-Up” system.

2.    Review and Approval:

a.    Supervisor review and approval of mark-up comments.

b.    Process for scanning and attaching marked-up work orders to the CMMS.

3.    Feedback Loop:

a.    Communication between planners/supervisors and originators of mark-up comments.

b.    Process for adopting or rejecting suggested changes.

4.7 Key Questions That Should Have Been Asked At This Point.

1.    How structured is the planning process, and do planners fully understand their role?

2.    Is there a system for creating and utilizing standard tasks for recurring maintenance?

3.    How accurately are work order resources and time requirements estimated?

4.    What processes are in place for managing and reviewing backlogged work?

5.    Are comprehensive work packs created for fully planned work orders?

6.    Is there an effective system for maintainers to provide feedback on work order content?

7.    How is maintainer feedback reviewed, processed, and communicated back to the originators?

5.0 Execute Work Readiness.

This section focuses on assessing the preparedness for work execution, ensuring all necessary elements are in place before maintenance tasks begin.

5.1 Pre-Execution Checklist.

1.    Resource Availability:

a.    Confirmation of personnel availability as per the schedule.

b.    Verification of required skills and certifications for assigned tasks.

2.    Materials and Tools:

a.    Confirmation that all required parts are available and staged.

b.    Verification of tool availability and condition.

3.    Documentation:

a.    Availability of complete work packs for each scheduled task.

b.    Accessibility of up-to-date procedures and safety instructions.

5.2 Safety Preparations.

1.    Risk Assessments:

a.    Completion of job safety analyses for high-risk tasks.

b.    Review and communication of identified hazards and control measures.

2.    Permits and Isolations:

a.    Preparation of necessary work permits.

b.    Planning and verification of required isolations.

5.3 Operational Readiness.

1.    Equipment Status:

a.    Confirmation that equipment is available for maintenance.

b.    Coordination with operations for equipment handover.

2.    Area Preparation:

a.    Verification that work areas are cleared and accessible.

b.    Implementation of necessary barricades or signage.

5.4 Communication.

1.    Pre-Execution Meetings:

a.    Scheduling and conducting pre-job briefings.

b.    Review of work scope, safety requirements, and potential challenges.

2.    Stakeholder Notification:

a.    Communication of planned work to all affected departments.

b.    Confirmation of support from auxiliary services (e.g., crane operators, scaffolders).

5.5 Key Questions That Should Have Been Asked At This Point.

1.    Is there a standardized pre-execution checklist used for all scheduled work?

2.    How is resource availability confirmed prior to work commencement?

3.    What process ensures all required materials and tools are ready before work starts?

4.    How are safety preparations, including risk assessments and permits, managed?

5.    Is there a clear process for equipment handover from operations to maintenance?

6.    Are pre-execution meetings conducted, and what do they typically cover?

7.    How is communication managed with all stakeholders before work execution begins?

6.0 Execute Work.

This section focuses on assessing the actual execution of maintenance work, ensuring efficiency, safety, and quality in the performance of tasks.

6.1 Work Order Execution Process.

1.    Adherence to Plans:

a.    Frequency of work performed according to planned procedures.

b.    Process for handling deviations from planned work.

2.    Time Management:

a.    Tracking of actual time spent on tasks compared to planned estimates.

b.    Methods for recording and justifying time variances.

6.2 Safety Compliance.

1.    Pre-Job Start Safety Briefings:

a.    Consistency in conducting pre-job safety meetings.

b.    Documentation of safety discussions and risk mitigation strategies.

2.    Permit Compliance:

a.    Adherence to work permit requirements.

b.    Process for managing permit extensions or modifications during work.

6.3 Quality Control.

1.    Work Quality Checks:

a.    Implementation of quality control measures during work execution.

b.    Process for supervisory oversight and approval of completed work.

2.    Documentation:

a.    Accuracy and completeness of work order documentation during execution.

b.    Capture of “as-found” and “as-left” equipment conditions.

6.4 Resource Utilization.

1.    Skill Matching:

a.    Alignment of assigned personnel skills with task requirements.

b.    Process for addressing skill gaps or specialized task needs.

2.    Tool and Equipment Usage:

a.    Availability and proper use of required tools and equipment.

b.    Tracking and management of specialized equipment.

6.5 Collaboration and Communication.

1.    Inter-Trade Coordination:

a.    Effectiveness of communication between different trades during multi-craft jobs.

b.    Management of handovers between shifts or teams.

2.    Stakeholder Updates:

a.    Process for keeping relevant stakeholders informed of work progress.

b.    Handling of unexpected issues or delays during execution.

6.6 Continuous Improvement.

1.    On-the-Job Learning:

a.    Identification and documentation of lessons learned during work execution.

b.    Process for sharing insights and best practices among team members.

2.    Feedback Mechanisms:

a.    Systems for capturing executor feedback on work order quality and accuracy.

b.    Process for incorporating feedback into future planning and execution.

6.7 Key Questions That Should Have Been Asked At This Point.

1.    How closely do executors adhere to planned procedures, and how are deviations managed?

2.    What processes are in place to ensure safety compliance throughout work execution?

3.    How is work quality monitored and ensured during the execution phase?

4.    Are resources (personnel, tools, equipment) effectively utilized during work execution?

5.    How well do different trades and shifts collaborate during complex or multi-day jobs?

6.    What mechanisms are in place to capture and utilize lessons learned from work execution?

7.    How is executor feedback on work order quality collected and incorporated into improvement processes?

7.0 Complete Work.

This section focuses on assessing the processes and procedures for finalizing maintenance tasks, ensuring proper documentation, and transitioning equipment back to operational status.

7.1 Work Order Closure.

1.    Documentation Completeness:

a.    Verification that all required fields in the work order are filled out.

b.    Accuracy and detail of work performed descriptions.

2.    Time and Resource Reporting:

a.    Proper recording of actual labour hours and materials used.

b.    Comparison of actual vs. planned resources and time.

7.2 Quality Assurance.

1.    Post-Work Inspections:

a.    Implementation of quality checks before work order closure.

b.    Process for supervisor or quality control sign-off on completed work.

2.    Testing and Verification:

a.    Procedures for equipment testing after maintenance.

b.    Documentation of test results and performance metrics.

7.3 Equipment Handover.

1.    Return to Service Process:

a.    Clear procedure for transitioning equipment back to operations.

b.    Communication protocols between maintenance and operations teams.

2.    Operational Readiness Checks:

a.    Verification of equipment functionality and safety before handover.

b.    Process for addressing any issues identified during handover.

7.4 Work Order History.

1.    Failure Analysis:

a.    Recording of failure modes and root causes for corrective work.

b.    Process for updating asset history with relevant information.

2.    Maintenance Strategy Updates:

a.    Mechanism for feeding completed work information back into maintenance strategies.

b.    Process for updating preventive maintenance tasks based on work order findings.

7.5 Performance Metrics.

1.    Completion Time Tracking:

a.    Measurement of time from work initiation to closure.

b.    Analysis of factors affecting work order completion times.

2.    Rework Monitoring:

a.    Tracking of instances where work needs to be re-done.

b.    Process for analysing and addressing causes of rework.

7.6 Continuous Improvement.

1.    Lessons Learned:

a.    System for capturing and sharing insights from completed work.

b.    Process for incorporating lessons into future planning and execution.

2.    Feedback Loop:

a.    Mechanism for maintainers to provide feedback on work order process.

b.    System for acting on feedback to improve overall maintenance processes.

7.7 Key Questions That Should Have Been Asked At This Point.

1.    How thorough and accurate is the documentation process for completed work orders?

a.    Does the information on the work order accurately reflect the work that was performed and has it been recorded at the appropriate level of detail?

2.    What quality assurance measures are in place to verify work before closure?

3.    How effective is the equipment handover process between maintenance and operations?

4.    Is failure analysis consistently performed and recorded for corrective work?

5.    How are completed work orders used to inform and update maintenance strategies?

6.    What metrics are tracked to assess work order completion performance?

7.    How are lessons learned from completed work captured and utilized for improvement?

8.0 Maintenance Systems Management & Compliance.

This section focuses on assessing the overall management of maintenance systems and ensuring compliance with established procedures and regulations.

8.1 CMMS Administration.

1.    System Configuration:

a.    Regular review and update of CMMS configuration settings.

b.    Process for managing user access rights and permissions.

2.    Data Integrity:

a.    Procedures for maintaining data accuracy and completeness.

b.    Regular audits of CMMS data quality.

8.2 Compliance Management.

1.    Statutory & Regulatory Requirements:

a.    System for tracking and managing statutory and regulatory compliance tasks.

b.    Process for updating maintenance procedures based on regulatory changes.

2.    Internal Policies:

a.    Adherence to company-specific maintenance policies and standards.

b.    Regular review and update of internal maintenance procedures.

8.3 Performance Monitoring.

1.    KPI Tracking:

a.    Implementation of key performance indicators for maintenance activities.

b.    Regular reporting and review of maintenance performance metrics.

2.    Trend Analysis:

a.    Process for identifying and analysing trends in maintenance data.

b.    Use of trend analysis to inform decision-making and strategy.

8.4 Document Control.

1.    Procedure Management:

a.    System for creating, reviewing, and updating maintenance procedures.

b.    Process for ensuring all staff have access to current versions of procedures.

2.    Record Keeping:

a.    Compliance with record retention policies for maintenance activities.

b.    Accessibility and organization of maintenance records.

8.5 Training and Competency.

1.    Skills Management:

a.    System for tracking and managing maintenance staff competencies.

b.    Regular assessment of training needs and implementation of training programs.

2.    CMMS User Training:

a.    Provision of initial and ongoing training for CMMS users.

b.    Process for assessing and improving CMMS user proficiency.

8.6 Continuous Improvement.

1.    Audit Processes:

a.    Regular internal audits of maintenance systems and processes.

b.    Implementation of corrective actions based on audit findings.

2.    Feedback Mechanisms:

a.    Systems for collecting and acting on feedback from maintenance staff and stakeholders.

b.    Process for incorporating lessons learned into system improvements.

8.7 Key Questions That Should Have Been Asked At This Point.

1.    How effectively is the CMMS administered and configured to meet organizational needs?

2.    What processes are in place to ensure compliance with both regulatory requirements and internal policies?

3.    How are maintenance performance metrics tracked, reported, and used for decision-making?

4.    Is there an effective system for managing maintenance procedures and records?

5.    How are staff competencies managed, and what training is provided for CMMS users?

6.    What processes are in place for continuous improvement of maintenance systems?

7.    How are internal audits conducted, and how are the findings addressed?

9.0 Improvements.

This section focuses on assessing the processes and procedures for continuous improvement within the maintenance system.

9.1 Improvement Identification.

1.    Root Cause Analysis:

a.    Implementation of formal root cause analysis processes for significant failures or recurring issues.

b.    Training and tools provided for staff to conduct effective root cause analyses.

2.    Performance Data Analysis:

a.    Regular review of maintenance KPIs to identify areas for improvement.

b.    Process for translating performance data into actionable improvement initiatives.

9.2 Improvement Planning.

1.    Prioritisation Process:

a.    System for evaluating and prioritising improvement opportunities.

b.    Criteria used for selecting improvement projects.

2.    Resource Allocation:

a.    Process for assigning resources (time, personnel, budget) to improvement initiatives.

b.    Balance between daily maintenance activities and improvement projects.

9.3 Implementation of Improvements.

1.    Project Management:

a.    Use of project management methodologies for implementing improvements.

b.    Tracking and reporting of improvement project progress.

2.    Change Management:

a.    Processes for managing the impact of improvements on existing systems and procedures.

b.    Communication strategies for rolling out changes to maintenance staff.

9.4 Evaluation of Improvements.

1.    Measuring Impact:

a.    Methods for quantifying the results of improvement initiatives.

b.    Comparison of pre- and post-implementation performance metrics.

2.    Feedback Loop:

a.    Process for gathering feedback on implemented improvements.

b.    System for incorporating lessons learned into future improvement efforts.

9.5 Continuous Learning.

1.    Best Practice Sharing:

a.    Mechanisms for sharing successful improvements across the organization.

b.    Participation in industry forums or benchmarking activities to identify external best practices.

2.    Training and Development:

a.    Ongoing training programs to enhance staff skills in improvement methodologies.

b.    Encouragement of staff-led improvement initiatives.

9.6 Innovation in Maintenance.

1.    Technology Adoption:

a.    Process for evaluating and implementing new maintenance technologies.

b.    Integration of innovative tools or techniques into existing maintenance processes.

2.    Predictive Maintenance:

a.    Development and implementation of predictive maintenance strategies.

b.    Use of data analytics and machine learning for maintenance optimisation.

9.7 Key Questions That Should Have Been Asked At This Point.

1.    How are areas for improvement systematically identified within the maintenance system?

2.    What processes are in place for prioritising and planning improvement initiatives?

3.    How effectively are improvement projects managed and implemented?

4.    What methods are used to measure and evaluate the impact of improvements?

5.    How is knowledge from improvement initiatives shared across the organization?

6.    What ongoing training or development opportunities are provided to support continuous improvement?

7.    How does the organization stay current with and adopt innovative maintenance practices or technologies?

10.0 Managing Costs & Reporting Functions.

This section focuses on assessing the processes and procedures for managing maintenance costs and generating reports that support decision-making and continuous improvement.

10.1 Cost Tracking and Analysis.

1.    Work Order Costing:

a.    Accuracy of labour and material costs attributed to individual work orders.

b.    Process for reviewing and approving work order costs.

2.    Budget Management:

a.    Procedures for creating and managing maintenance budgets.

b.    Regular comparison of actual vs. budgeted maintenance costs.

3.    Cost Allocation:

a.    System for allocating maintenance costs to appropriate cost centres or assets.

b.    Accuracy and timeliness of cost allocation processes.

10.2 Financial Reporting.

1.    Standard Reports:

a.    Availability of pre-configured financial reports within the CMMS.

b.    Frequency and distribution of standard financial reports.

2.    Custom Reporting:

a.    Capability to generate ad-hoc financial reports as needed.

b.    Training and tools provided for staff to create custom reports.

10.3 Performance Metrics.

1.    Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):

a.    Definition and tracking of cost-related KPIs (e.g., maintenance cost per unit of production).

b.    Process for reviewing and acting on KPI trends.

2.    Benchmarking:

a.    Comparison of maintenance costs against industry standards or similar facilities.

b.    Use of benchmarking data to identify areas for cost improvement.

10.4 Cost Optimisation.

1.    Cost Reduction Initiatives:

a.    Process for identifying and implementing cost-saving measures.

b.    Tracking and reporting of cost reduction achievements.

2.    Life Cycle Cost Analysis:

a.    Use of life cycle costing in equipment replacement decisions.

b.    Integration of life cycle cost data into maintenance strategy development.

10.5 Inventory Cost Management.

1.    Spare Parts Optimisation:

a.    Processes for optimising inventory levels to balance costs and availability.

b.    Regular review of slow-moving or obsolete inventory items.

2.    Procurement Efficiency:

a.    Analysis of procurement costs and lead times.

b.    Strategies for reducing procurement-related expenses.

10.6 Reporting Technology.

1.    CMMS Reporting Capabilities:

a.    Utilization of built-in CMMS reporting functions.

b.    Integration with external business intelligence tools for advanced analytics.

2.    Data Visualization:

a.    Use of dashboards and visual reporting tools to present maintenance cost data.

b.    Accessibility of cost reports to relevant stakeholders.

10.7 Continuous Improvement.

1.    Cost Trend Analysis:

a.    Regular review of long-term cost trends to identify systemic issues.

b.    Process for using cost data to inform maintenance strategy adjustments.

2.    Return on Investment (ROI) Analysis:

a.    Evaluation of ROI for major maintenance initiatives or equipment upgrades.

b.    Use of ROI data to justify future maintenance investments.

10.8 Key Questions That Should Have Been Asked At This Point.

1.    How accurately are labour and material costs tracked and attributed to work orders?

2.    What processes are in place for creating, managing, and reviewing maintenance budgets?

3.    How effectively does the organization use financial reporting to support decision-making?

4.    What cost-related KPIs are tracked, and how are they used to drive improvement?

5.    How does the organization identify and implement cost optimisation initiatives?

6.    Is life cycle cost analysis used in equipment management decisions?

7.    How effectively are inventory costs managed and optimised?

8.    What reporting tools and technologies are used to analyse and present maintenance cost data?

9.    How is cost data used to drive continuous improvement in maintenance practices?

11.0 Asking The Right Types Of Questions During Audits.

This section focuses on the importance of using appropriate questioning techniques during maintenance systems audits, with a particular emphasis on searching questions.

11.1 Types of Questions.

1.    Open Questions:

a.    Example 1: “What challenges have you faced in implementing preventive maintenance?”

                                 i.    Good: Allows respondents to share their unique experiences and insights.

                                ii.    Bad: Might lead to overly lengthy or unfocused responses if not properly managed.

b.    Example 2: “How do you approach training new maintenance technicians?”

                                 i.    Good: Encourages detailed explanations of training processes and philosophies.

                                ii.    Bad: Could result in vague answers if the respondent doesn’t have a structured approach.

c.    Example 3: “What factors do you consider when deciding to repair or replace equipment?”

                                 i.    Good: Prompts thoughtful consideration of multiple aspects of decision-making.

                                ii.    Bad: Might be overwhelming for less experienced staff or lead to inconsistent responses across different individuals.

2.    Closed Questions:

a.    Example 1: “Is your maintenance team certified in lockout/tagout procedures?”

                                 i.    Good: Quickly identifies compliance with a specific safety requirement.

                                ii.    Bad: Doesn’t provide context or details about the extent of training or implementation.

b.    Example 2: “Do you conduct daily equipment inspections?”

                                 i.    Good: Directly assesses adherence to a particular maintenance practice.

                                ii.    Bad: Misses nuances in frequency or quality of inspections.

c.    Example 3: “Have you implemented a predictive maintenance program?”

                                 i.    Good: Clearly establishes the presence or absence of a specific maintenance strategy.

                                ii.    Bad: Doesn’t reveal the extent or effectiveness of the program if it exists.

3.    Leading Questions

a.    Example 1: “Don’t you think preventive maintenance is more cost-effective than reactive maintenance?”

                                 i.    Good: Can quickly confirm alignment with best practices if the respondent agrees.

                                ii.    Bad: May pressure the respondent to agree even if their experience differs, leading to inaccurate information.

b.    Example 2: “Surely you’ve noticed an improvement in equipment reliability since implementing condition monitoring, right?”

                                 i.    Good: Might encourage positive reflection on implemented changes.

                                ii.    Bad: Can bias the response and miss out on honest feedback about challenges or shortcomings.

c.    Example 3: “You always document all maintenance activities in detail, don’t you?”

                                 i.    Good: Emphasizes the importance of thorough documentation.

                                ii.    Bad: May lead to an overstated or unrealistic portrayal of actual practices.

4.    Searching Questions:

a.    Example 1: “Can you walk me through the last time you troubleshooted a complex equipment failure?”

                                 i.    Good: Elicits specific, detailed information about real-world problem-solving processes.

                                ii.    Bad: Might be time-consuming or difficult for the respondent to recall all details accurately.

b.    Example 2: “What data do you collect to measure the effectiveness of your preventive maintenance program?”

                                 i.    Good: Probes for concrete evidence of performance tracking and analysis.

                                ii.    Bad: Could be challenging to answer if the organization lacks robust data collection practices.

c.    Example 3: “How do you determine the appropriate inventory levels for critical spare parts?”

                                 i.    Good: Encourages the respondent to explain their decision-making process with specific criteria.

                                ii.    Bad: Might be difficult to answer if the process is informal or not well-defined.

11.2 Importance of Searching Questions in Audits.

1.    Evidence Gathering.

·        Searching questions help auditors collect concrete evidence rather than relying on assumptions or general statements.

2.    Depth of Understanding.

·        These questions allow auditors to delve deeper into processes and uncover potential issues.

3.    Objectivity.

·        By focusing on specific details, searching questions help maintain objectivity in the audit process.

11.3 Techniques for Asking Effective Searching Questions.

1.    Use of “How,” “What,” “When,” “Where,” “Who,” and “Why”.

·        Example: “How do you ensure all critical equipment is included in the preventive maintenance schedule?”

2.    Request for Examples.

·        Example: “Can you provide a specific instance where this procedure was applied successfully?”

3.    Seeking Documentation.

·        Example: “Where can I find the records of the last three maintenance strategy reviews?”

4.    Probing for Details.

·        Example: “What specific criteria do you use to determine if a work order is fully planned?”

11.4 Common Pitfalls to Avoid.

1.    Overuse of Closed Questions.

·        Limit questions that can be answered with only a simple yes or no.

2.    Leading the Auditee.

·        Avoid suggesting the desired answer in your question.

3.    Compound Questions.

·        Ask one question at a time to ensure clear and focused responses.

4.    Assuming Knowledge.

·        Don’t assume the auditee understands technical terms or acronyms.

11.5 Practicing Effective Questioning.

1.    Prepare Questions in Advance.

·        Develop a list of key searching questions for each audit area.

2.    Active Listening.

·        Pay close attention to responses and ask follow-up questions as needed.

3.    Encourage Elaboration.

·        Use phrases like “Tell me more about…” or “Can you elaborate on…”

4.    Document Responses Accurately.

·        Take detailed notes or use recording devices when permitted.

11.6 Key Audit Questions About Questioning Techniques.

1.    Are auditors trained in effective questioning techniques, particularly in the use of searching questions?

2.    How do auditors prepare their questions before conducting an audit?

3.    Is there a process for reviewing the effectiveness of questions used in previous audits?

4.    How do auditors ensure they’re gathering concrete evidence rather than relying on general statements?

5.    What methods are used to encourage auditees to provide detailed, specific responses?

12.0 The Critical Role of Quality Audits in Preventing Disasters.

This section explores how regular, professional-quality audits can prevent major problems and disasters in maintenance systems, with a focus on various risk analysis models.

12.1 The Swiss Cheese Model in Maintenance Auditing.

1.    Concept Overview:

a.    Developed by James Reason in the late 1990’s. 

b.    He introduced it in a 2000 article in the British Medical Journal titled “Human Error: Models and Management” and since then this model has been used globally as a framework for understanding and managing human errors in complex and dangerous systems.

c.    Visualizes defences as layers of Swiss cheese, with holes representing weaknesses.

d.    Used extensively in the Oil & Gas Industry in Australia.

2.    Application to Maintenance Systems:

a.    Each layer represents a defence mechanism (e.g., procedures, training, inspections).

b.    Holes align when multiple defences fail, potentially leading to accidents and in some extreme cases, disasters.

3.    Role of Audits:

a.    Regular audits help identify and address “holes” in defence layers.

b.    Prevents alignment of weaknesses across multiple systems.

12.2 Alternative Risk Analysis Models for Maintenance Auditing.

1.    Bow-Tie Method:

a.    Combines Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and Event Tree Analysis (ETA).

b.    Visually maps potential causes and consequences of incidents.

c.    Helps identify preventive and mitigative measures.

2.    Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS):

a.    Focuses on human error as a contributing factor.

b.    Categorizes errors from unsafe acts to organizational influences.

c.    Provides a comprehensive view of potential human-related issues.

3.    Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP):

a.    Emphasizes systemic factors and interactions leading to accidents.

b.    Helps identify vulnerabilities within the entire maintenance system.

c.    Improves overall safety by addressing system-wide issues.

4.    Incident Cause and Analysis Model (ICAM):

a.    Aids in identifying root causes of incidents.

b.    Provides a structured approach to analysing and addressing causes.

c.    Useful for post-incident analysis and prevention of future occurrences.

12.3 Importance of Regular, High-Quality Audits.

1.    Early Detection of Issues:

a.    Regular audits catch problems before they escalate.

b.    Allows for proactive rather than reactive maintenance.

2.    Continuous Improvement:

a.    Frequent audits create a culture of ongoing enhancement.

b.    Helps maintain high standards and best practices.

3.    Compliance Assurance:

a.    Ensures adherence to regulatory requirements and industry standards.

b.    Reduces risk of legal and financial penalties.

4.    Cost Savings:

a.    Prevents costly breakdowns and unplanned downtime.

b.    Optimises resource allocation based on audit findings.

5.    Safety Enhancement:

a.    Identifies potential safety hazards before accidents occur.

b.    Contributes to a safer work environment for maintenance personnel.

12.4 Implementing Effective Audit Programs.

1.    Frequency and Scope:

a.    Determine optimal audit frequency based on risk assessment.

b.    Ensure comprehensive coverage of all maintenance systems.

2.    Auditor Qualifications:

a.    Use trained, experienced auditors familiar with maintenance systems.

b.    Consider both internal and external auditors for different perspectives.

3.    Audit Methodology:

a.    Employ a combination of risk analysis models for thorough assessment.

b.    Tailor audit approach to specific maintenance system characteristics.

4.    Follow-up and Action Plans:

a.    Develop clear action plans based on audit findings.

b.    Ensure timely implementation of corrective measures.

5.    Continuous Learning:

a.    Use audit results to inform training programs and system improvements.

b.    Share lessons learned across the organization.

12.5 Key Audit Questions About Quality Audits.

1.    How frequently are comprehensive maintenance system audits conducted?

2.    What risk analysis models are employed in the audit process?

3.    How are audit findings translated into actionable improvements?

4.    Is there a system in place for tracking the implementation of audit recommendations?

5.    How does the organization ensure auditor competence and objectivity?

13.0 Conclusion: The Path to Maintenance Excellence.

This final section summarises the key points of what I’ve provided as a maintenance systems auditing guide and emphasizes the importance of doing these audits (your versions of them) and pushing continuous improvement in maintenance practices.

13.1 Recap of Key Audit Areas.

1.    Master Data & Maintenance Strategy Development.

·        Importance of accurate equipment data and well-developed maintenance strategies.

2.    Work Management Process.

·        From identification to completion, ensuring efficient work flow

3.    Planning and Scheduling.

·        Emphasizing the critical role of proper planning and effective scheduling.

4.    Execution and Completion.

·        Focusing on quality work execution and thorough completion processes

5.    Continuous Improvement.

·        Highlighting the ongoing need for system enhancements.

6.    Cost Management and Reporting.

·        Stressing the importance of financial oversight and performance metrics.

7.    Effective Questioning Techniques.

·        Emphasizing the role of searching questions in conducting thorough audits.

8.    Risk Analysis and Disaster Prevention.

·        Underlining the critical role of audits in preventing major issues.

13.2 The Value of Comprehensive Auditing.

1.    Proactive Problem Identification.

·        Regular audits help catch issues before they escalate into major problems.

2.    Performance Optimisation.

·        Audits provide insights for improving maintenance efficiency and effectiveness.

3.    Compliance Assurance.

·        Ensures adherence to regulatory requirements and industry best practices.

4.    Cost Reduction.

·        Identifies areas for potential cost savings and resource optimisation.

5.    Safety Enhancement.

·        Contributes to a safer working environment by identifying and addressing risks.

13.3 Moving Forward: Implementing Audit Findings.

1.    Action Plan Development.

·        Create specific, measurable, and time-bound action plans based on audit results.

2.    Leadership Commitment.

·        Ensure management support for implementing recommended improvements.

3.    Employee Engagement.

·        Involve staff at all levels in the improvement process.

4.    Progress Tracking.

·        Regularly monitor and report on the implementation of audit recommendations.

5.    Continuous Learning.

·        Use audit findings as learning opportunities to enhance maintenance practices.

13.4 The Role Of Technology In Future Audits.

1.    Digital Audit Tools.

·        I don’t think we’ll ever need or want to get rid of the human element with auditing but I’m sure we’ll be able to better leverage technology for more efficient and accurate auditing processes.

2.    Data Analytics.

·        Utilizing advanced analytics for deeper insights from audit data and I’m sure AI is going to play a much bigger role with this in the future.

3.    Integration with CMMS.

·        Seamless connection between audit processes and maintenance management systems, our CMMS/AMS/ERP software. 

·        In this context it would be advantageous if our audits were processed via apps on tablets and the results fed directly into our maintenance management product and have the entered results ‘workflow’d’ through our system and acted upon by the right positions and actions raised (just as you would with a safety incident) and processed within the same software.

13.5 Final Comments.

Maintenance systems auditing is not just a compliance exercise but a powerful tool for driving continuous improvement.

By regularly assessing your maintenance practices, you can:

1.    Enhance equipment reliability.

2.    Optimise resource utilization.

3.    Improve safety standards.

4.    Reduce operational costs.

5.    Foster a culture of excellence in maintenance.

Remember, the goal of these audits is not to find fault (it’s not a witch hunt), but to identify opportunities for improvement.

The audit process is often a chance for us to learn “What Does Good Look Like?” for a particular area of operations & maintenance or a particular scenario etc and, “How are we positioned in respect to that?”

I encourage people to embrace the audit process as a step on a pathway towards achieving maintenance excellence and drive your organization towards world-class performance.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Scroll to Top